Antiradary-Forum.NET
https://www.antiradary-forum.net/

Best detector against Multanova 6F 34,3GHz
https://www.antiradary-forum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=93		 Stránka 2 z 3
Autor:  shwaara [ pon 12. led 2009 00:01:00 ]
Předmět příspěvku: 
nano píše:
What i just was thinking of: Is the new law in CZ already in force, which makes a execution about traffic penaltys up to 70? in the entire EU possible??
You can find the law abstract here: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.dožuri=OJ:L:2005:076:0016:0030:CS:PDF

Thanks.
I think it is on force.
Autor:  nano [ pon 12. led 2009 17:56:00 ]
Předmět příspěvku: 
shwaara píše:
I think it is on force.

Do you know since when?? Any news reports on the web??
Autor:  shwaara [ pon 12. led 2009 18:02:00 ]
Předmět příspěvku: 
I've found out two notices.
The first says that the rule should be accepted in 2009. Source was euroscop, I think.
The second one say it was accepted in 2006 (web of Parliament).
Both sources are high relevant, so I'm little bit confused. But one thing is sure, one of these information is wrong :-)
Autor:  nano [ pon 12. led 2009 19:46:00 ]
Předmět příspěvku: 
nano píše:
msp_x píše:
We probably won't help you more since multanovas are not used in CZ.

OK!! I thought i saw some videos with multanovas from you guys, but maybe I missunderstood something!!

Just found the video again, which I meant:
http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=RCFBaeRfX0k&feature=channel_page

The user "ridicBOB" should be from CZ, if you could believe his profil details:
http://de.youtube.com/user/ridicBOB
Autor:  shwaara [ pon 12. led 2009 19:53:00 ]
Předmět příspěvku: 
Yes, RidicBob is our friend, but he met this Multanova in Austria ("Multanova v Rakousku") so we don't have much experiences with Multanova.
But nice video :-)
Autor:  nano [ pon 12. led 2009 20:19:00 ]
Předmět příspěvku: 
shwaara píše:
Yes, RidicBob is our friend, but he met this Multanova in Austria ("Multanova v Rakousku")

This explains a lot!! :D
Rakousku = Austria :roll:

Now i looked twice at the video and was able to read: "Frische Steinpilze - 50m" which means "fresh porcino [hřib] in 50 metres"!!
:D

shwaara píše:
But nice video :-)

I agree with that and it's proof enough to me, that the 975e works perfect against Multanova AND in Austria.
So i guess ridicROB hasn't used a cone?? Is he at this forum?? Maybe he can say some words to the 975e against Austrian Multanovas!!
Autor:  shwaara [ pon 12. led 2009 20:40:00 ]
Předmět příspěvku: 
RodicBob certainly didn't use any cone:) He is a member of this forum, you can find him in a member list (seznam uživatelů) above.
Autor:  nano [ pon 12. led 2009 23:12:00 ]
Předmět příspěvku: 
shwaara píše:
RodicBob certainly didn't use any cone:) He is a member of this forum, you can find him in a member list (seznam uživatelů) above.

Just sent him a message!!

Following your link in your signature i found out, that you're still selling LT400.
Do you know if there is a jammed message on any lasergun??

I was told in the LI forum, that LT causes a jammed on the Riegl LR235-90. Which i couldn't really believe, because there are a lot of LT400s in Austria and Germany used and there was never a problem with this lasergun. Maybe Riegl did a software update??

Which types of laserguns are used in CZ??
Autor:  řidič BOB [ pon 12. led 2009 23:24:00 ]
Předmět příspěvku: 
I´ve many experiences with Multanova in Austria and in Germany. I use 975e + V1 (always actual version) + RX65e and I had always excelent detection. Never any problems...
Autor:  shwaara [ pon 12. led 2009 23:24:00 ]
Předmět příspěvku: 
The company in my link is not mine, I'm just satisfied customer. So circumstances about LT400 would say you Robert from the company (or somebody else from this forum).
Laser guns in CZ: LTI and PLIII. Exect specification maybe supply another member of this forum.
Autor:  řidič BOB [ pon 12. led 2009 23:27:00 ]
Předmět příspěvku: 
nano píše:
Which types of laserguns are used in CZ??


Practically only ProLaser3 and LTI 20-20 125pps. Town police in Prague use one TraffiPatrolXR in VW Transporter. And that´s all. ;)
Autor:  nano [ pon 12. led 2009 23:29:00 ]
Předmět příspěvku: 
I think it's better if we go on with the diskussion in public:

@řidič BOB
Have you made some more videos with your 975e against Multanova??

Is the 975e a lot better than the V1, against Multanova??

řidič BOB píše:
I´ve many experiences with Multanova in Austria and in Germany. I use 975e + V1 (always actual version) + RX65e and I had always excelent detection. Never any problems...

Can you specify this a bit more?? What was your average range??
Which is your favourite on our Multanova??
Autor:  řidič BOB [ pon 12. led 2009 23:36:00 ]
Předmět příspěvku: 
No, I don´t have more videos. :-( Very often I´m in a hurry :D
My favourite detector with standard very good detection is 975e. This detector is the most sensitive... Very comfrotable is also hidden assembly.
I don´t remember every range against Multanova in A or D, but I can say, that it´s more than 250m with 975e.
Autor:  nano [ úte 13. led 2009 19:09:00 ]
Předmět příspěvku: 
řidič BOB píše:
My favourite detector with standard very good detection is 975e. This detector is the most sensitive...

Thanks for your opinion!!

I'm giving 975e a chance and will test him against our radars!!
Autor:  Robert [ pát 16. led 2009 01:30:00 ]
Předmět příspěvku: 
Hi there, it is nice to see here someone from foreign country! Welcome here!

Just few hints:

975e is definitely newer hardware than 966R. The sensitivity at 34,3GHz is much better with 975e. Can switch all bands on and off again and extended horn will bring of course much better sensitivity than without the horn. I have tested this like two years ago with Valentine One and the results were great. My antena was about 12cm long??? do not remember but it is somewhere here on the phorum. There was like 100% gain in the distance of the detection so great diference... I did not notice any higher false allerts count and if I remember right there was incredibely lower falsing with this added extension.

Yesterday I got the email where Target Automotive offered me his own solution of aditional horn. The only problem is that the horn increase the size of the antenna a lot and after that it is quite difficult to fit this solution into different types of cars...

Here is the picture: As you can see there is also ability tomount the detector facing down and spare some place...
Stránka 2 z 3 Všechny časy jsou v UTC + 1 hodina [ Letní čas ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/